🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial action to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is sparking debate internationally. Politicians, campaigners, and guardians are observing closely to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Trend

Across Europe, a growing group of states are considering comparable bans.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM stating that smartphones and platforms are "stealing our kids' innocence". The policy is expected to be formalized soon.
• Norway is set to introduce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to protect the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is working on a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. Authorities have stated that an similar ban is "one of the measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has called on the legislature to pass a proposal increasing the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a comparable step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has advised parents to prevent their children from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a non-binding motion demanding a ban for under-16s without parental consent is given. While it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these services, the step does not create enforceable legislation.

"A clear age limit is a useful foundation," commented one MEP driving the resolution.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Eye

Across Britain, the government has not ruled out a possible ban, emphasizing that "nothing is being dismissed" but maintaining any decision must be "based on strong data".

Previously, support gathered behind a bill to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. Instead, the administration vowed to further research the issue.

Charities have raised apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after being exposed to disturbing online content argues that a simple age ban may not make platforms safer and could create a "dangerous transition" of risk when young people reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to design platforms and apps that are appropriate and age appropriate for young users," said a prominent online safety campaigner.

America: A State-by-State Landscape

Across America, action is mostly unfolding at the regional level amid national gridlock.

• Utah demands parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has signed a law prohibiting children under fourteen from joining social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation limiting minors to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with extra use requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted bills requiring adult authorization for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and calls from certain figures to mimic Australia's lead, a US-wide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Views

Beyond these regions, additional states are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

However, world organizations adopt a more measured tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "could have unintended consequences". The agency points out that social networks can be a "vital connection" for isolated young people and that government action should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in user protection.

As this worldwide conversation evolves, the steps of the Australian government and others indicate that governments around the world are no longer willing to stand by for tech companies to act voluntarily.